How Much Does a Commercial Photographer Cost in Christchurch?
The short answer is: it depends.
I know that probably isn’t the answer you were hoping for.
If you’ve searched this question, chances are you’ve got a job in mind and you’re trying to work out whether professional photography is going to cost $300, $3,000 or something completely different. The problem is that asking how much commercial photography costs is a bit like asking how much a bag of groceries costs. You can’t really answer it until you know what’s going in the bag. A single business headshot, a two-hour conference, a full-day brand shoot, fifty products photographed in a studio and a multi-location advertising campaign are all commercial photography. But they are completely different jobs. So rather than throw out a number that may have absolutely nothing to do with what you need, I think it’s more useful to explain what you’re actually paying for, what makes the price move up or down, and how to get a realistic figure for your particular project.
Because one thing I’ve learnt photographing businesses is that the time spent pressing the shutter button is only a very small part of the job.
Start with the result, not the hourly rate
When somebody contacts me asking what I charge for photography, one of the first things I want to understand is what they are actually trying to achieve.
Not because I’m trying to avoid giving them a price. Because without that information, the price doesn’t mean very much. You might need one photograph for LinkedIn. You might be building an entirely new website and need photographs of your team, workplace, products, services and customers.
You might have an annual conference where important moments happen once and cannot be repeated. Or perhaps you’ve got twenty products that all need to be photographed consistently for an online store. They all involve a camera.
That’s about where the similarity ends. This is why I think the better starting question is: What do you need the photography to do for your business?
Once we know that, we can work backwards and figure out what needs to be photographed, how we should photograph it, how much time is realistically required and what the project is likely to cost.
The photograph might take 1/1000th of a second. The job doesn’t.
This is probably one of the biggest misunderstandings around professional photography. A photograph may literally be captured in a fraction of a second.
But that fraction of a second might be the result of hours of work. There could be emails beforehand to understand the project.
A phone call.
A brief.
A Pinterest board or visual references.
A shot list.
Checking the location.
Looking at where the sun will be.
Watching the weather forecast.
Working out what lighting I need.
Charging batteries.
Preparing cameras.
Packing backup equipment.
Driving to the location.
Setting everything up.
Helping people relax.
Moving furniture.
Adjusting lighting.
Waiting for the right moment.
Taking the photographs.
Backing everything up afterwards.
Sorting through the files.
Building a proof gallery.
Waiting for selections.
Editing the chosen photographs.
Exporting different files.
Uploading them.
Delivering them.
Then there’s the administration holding all of that together. None of those things are particularly glamorous. But they are part of producing professional photography reliably. You’re not just paying for the moment the camera goes click.
You’re paying for the photographer, not just the photograph
I sometimes compare it to hiring a chef. Most of us can cook something for dinner.
We own frying pans. We have an oven. We know roughly what happens when you put food in one. That doesn’t make us chefs. When you hire a professional chef, you aren’t paying them because they own better frying pans. You’re paying for everything they know about ingredients, preparation, timing, temperature, flavour, presentation and what to do when something isn’t going according to plan.
Photography is much the same. Modern cameras are incredible. Phones are incredible. But owning one doesn’t automatically give somebody the experience to look at a situation and know how to create the photograph you need. Sometimes I need to freeze movement. Sometimes I deliberately want movement.
Sometimes I need to add light. Sometimes I need to remove it. Sometimes the technically "perfect" composition is actually wrong because your graphic designer needs a huge area of negative space for a headline. Sometimes I need somebody who hates having their photo taken to look comfortable within five minutes.
Sometimes there is one opportunity to get the photograph and then that moment is gone. That judgement is a big part of what you're hiring.
Even a simple job has more behind it than you might think
Take one straightforward business headshot. Let’s say you’re local to me around Rangiora or Christchurch. We photograph outside. The weather is good. There’s no complicated studio lighting setup. We spend some time getting a range of photographs, you choose the one you like, I professionally edit it and supply the finished file. Nice and simple.
Even something like that, once I account for communication, preparation, travel, the time with you, file management, your selection, editing, exporting and delivery, would generally start at around $400 + GST through Display.
I’m not saying that because every headshot costs $400. They don’t.
It’s simply a useful real-world example of why "I only need one photo" doesn’t necessarily mean there is only ten minutes of work involved.
Now make it twenty staff.
Or give me a boardroom with no natural light.
Or ask for three finished photographs of each person.
Or add team photographs.
Or ask me to build a portable studio in your workplace.
Same category of photography.
Very different job.
This is also why comparing photographers by the hour can be misleading
Hourly rates are useful. I use time as part of my own pricing. But an hourly rate by itself doesn’t tell you what a project is going to cost. Imagine two photographers both spend three hours at your business. One might simply turn up and photograph whatever is happening. The other may have spent time beforehand understanding your website, talking through the brief, building a shot list, planning lighting, working out where each photograph could be used and then spend several hours afterwards preparing the finished images. Technically they were both "there for three hours". You’re not necessarily buying the same thing.
This is also why I’m wary of competing purely on price. There will almost always be somebody who can do something cheaper. There will also almost always be somebody more expensive. That’s completely normal. Some people choose a photographer because of price. Some choose because they’ve been referred.
Some have seen their work and love the style. Some look at Google reviews.
Some want somebody who understands their industry. Some simply want someone they feel comfortable working with. I don't believe any one of those is inherently wrong. But I’m not interested in stripping the work back until I’m the cheapest photographer on the quote sheet. I’d rather work out what you actually need and give the project the time and care required to achieve it properly.
A brand shoot and an event are not the same thing
This is another area where commercial photography pricing can seem strange from the outside. You might hire a photographer for an event and receive a large number of finished photographs. Then commission a brand shoot for roughly the same amount of time and receive fewer images. Why? Because they are completely different styles of photography. At an event, I’m largely documenting something that is already happening. People are talking. Guests are networking.
Speakers are presenting. Awards are being handed out. I’m moving through it, anticipating moments and trying to capture as much useful material as possible.
There is still a lot of skill involved, particularly when the lighting is horrible or something important only happens once, but I generally have less control over what is happening in front of me. A brand shoot can be almost the opposite.
We might create a photograph, look at it, move somebody two metres, change the light, remove something distracting from the background, photograph it again, then do a vertical version because you need it for social media and a wider version because the website designer needs text on the left. We might create ten variations and ultimately select one. You receive fewer photographs, but considerably more work may have gone into each photograph. So comparing commercial photography purely by the number of finished images isn’t particularly useful either.
Product photography has its own set of variables
Then there are products. People sometimes look at a small product and understandably think: "How difficult can that possibly be to photograph?"
Sometimes it is easy. Sometimes that tiny object will happily consume half your afternoon. A cardboard box is relatively forgiving. A highly reflective stainless-steel product may show the camera, the photographer, the lights and half the room in its surface. Glass has its own challenges. Jewellery has another set entirely.
Products may need to be cleaned, positioned and aligned. Labels need to sit straight. Reflections need to be controlled. Colours need to be accurate. Different products need to look consistent beside each other. Perhaps you need them photographed on white. Perhaps you need the backgrounds removed.
Perhaps you want them styled in an environment. Again, "one product photograph" tells me almost nothing about what is actually involved.
Good commercial photography is built around how you will use it
This is one of the areas where experience with businesses really changes how I photograph. A beautiful picture isn't necessarily a useful commercial picture.
Your website designer might need negative space on the left. Your annual report might require a vertical image. Your social media person might need square and portrait crops. An advertising campaign might need room for a headline.
Your recruitment page may need photographs that actually show what it feels like to work in your business rather than another lineup of smiling people against a wall. Those requirements influence how I photograph the job. They also influence how much we can realistically achieve in the available time. That's why I like understanding the purpose of the photography before I start taking it.
The goal isn't simply to give you pretty pictures. The goal is to give you useful pretty pictures. Images that can actually earn their keep.
Experience is partly about knowing what could go wrong
There is another less visible part of professional photography that you're paying for.
Responsibility.
What happens if it rains?
What happens if the person we’re photographing gets delayed?
What happens if the location you had planned to use suddenly isn’t available?
What happens if the room is incredibly dark?
What happens if a flash stops working?
What happens if a memory card fails?
What happens if there is one important presentation at an event and there is no second opportunity to capture it?
A lot of professional experience is simply having encountered enough situations that you know how to respond when the plan changes.
Sometimes that means backup equipment.
Sometimes it means a backup date.
Sometimes it means changing the photograph completely.
Sometimes it means making a quick technical decision while everyone else carries on with their day.
When everything works perfectly, you might never notice any of that.
That's kind of the point.
So what actually makes a commercial photography quote go up or down?
Usually it comes back to scope and complexity.
How much do we need to photograph?
How much time will that realistically take?
How much preparation is required?
How many locations are involved?
How many people need coordinating?
Do we need specialised lighting?
How much travel is involved?
How many final photographs do you need?
How much post-production is required?
Do we have tight deadlines?
Are there weather dependencies?
Are we trying to capture photography and video at the same time?
Is the shoot straightforward and repeatable, or are we documenting something that will only happen once?
The clearer we are about those things, the more accurate the quote becomes.
You can absolutely tell me your budget
I think some clients are nervous about doing this. They worry that if they tell a photographer: "We've got $2,000." the photographer will mysteriously come back with a quote for exactly $2,000. But knowing the budget can actually be incredibly useful. If you tell me what you are hoping to achieve and what you realistically have available to spend, we can look at whether those two things align. Maybe they do. Maybe they don't. Maybe we can photograph one location instead of three. Maybe we concentrate on your ten most important products. Maybe we create fifteen really useful images instead of fifty average ones. Maybe we do photography now and video later. Maybe there is a much simpler way of achieving the result. I'd much rather have that conversation than spend time building a quote around something you were never going to be able to afford. And if you genuinely have no idea what the budget should be, that is perfectly normal too.
Most businesses don't commission professional photography every week.
You aren't expected to know.
If you have never hired a commercial photographer before, start here
You don't need to arrive with a perfect creative brief. Just tell me what you're trying to achieve. Something as simple as: "We're building a new website and need photographs that show our team and what we do." is enough to start.
From there I'll normally want to understand things like who or what needs photographing, where it will happen, approximately how many finished photographs you think you'll need, where you plan to use them and whether there is a particular deadline or budget we need to work around. If you've got examples of photography you like, send those too. A Pinterest board can be incredibly useful.
From there we can figure out what it is actually going to take.
Is professional commercial photography worth paying for?
That ultimately depends on what the photographs are expected to do.
A photograph could be posted once on social media and disappear down the feed.
Or that same investment could create an image that sits on the homepage of your website for the next five years.
It could appear in an annual report.
On a billboard.
In a tender.
In a magazine.
Across LinkedIn.
Inside a sales presentation.
In recruitment advertising.
On signage.
In brochures.
Across an entire marketing campaign.
That's why I tend to think about commercial photography as an asset rather than simply a cost.
The useful question isn't necessarily:
"How many photos am I getting for my money?"
It might be:
"How much use can my business get out of the photographs we're creating?"
One really good, versatile library can keep working for a business long after the photography itself has finished.
So, how much does a commercial photographer cost in Christchurch?
We’ve come all the way back to the beginning.
It depends.
But hopefully now that answer feels considerably less like a cop-out.
A simple local commercial photography job may start in the hundreds of dollars.
A larger project involving more time, people, locations, planning, travel or post-production will naturally cost more. There isn't one correct price because there isn't one standard commercial photography job. And I don't think there should be. The job should be built around what the business actually needs.
If you're looking for a commercial photographer in Christchurch, Rangiora or elsewhere in Canterbury and you’re trying to work out what your project might cost, you don't need to solve all of this before getting in touch. Tell me what you're trying to achieve. Tell me what needs photographing. And if you have a budget in mind, tell me that too. We can work out the rest together.
I'm Brendan Holt, the photographer and videographer behind Display Photo & Video, based in Rangiora near Christchurch and working with businesses and organisations across Canterbury and throughout New Zealand. My aim is pretty simple: create professional photography that isn't just nice to look at, but genuinely useful to the business paying for it.
Helping businesses put their business on display and look like they mean business.
Comments